Thursday, May 30, 2019
Crime and Punishment Essay :: essays research papers
By the end of Dostoyeskys Crime and Punishment, the reader is no longer under the illusion of the possible existence of preternatural men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded whizs too, the book is a journey through Raskolnikovs proposed possibility on crime. It is a theory based on the ideas that had been printed and read a thousand times(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a Ger piece of music philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian emphasis on the ends rather than the means whereby a loony toons existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsches more selfish philosophy focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate punishment as he realized that his existence was not that of the marvellous man presented in his theory. In chapter five of part three in Crime and Punishment, this theory is outlined by its creator, Raskolnikov. Such an innovative theory would clearly hand placed him in the extraordinary category, but when he fails to meet its standards, by submitting to the common law through his confession, the theory crumbles right before the readers eyes. The majority of Raskolnikovs theory seems logical until the reader arrives at its single essential flaw. Raskolnikovs idea that the enactment of a crime is invariably go with by illness(311) was one aspect of the theory which, through its accuracy in Raskolnikovs crime, seemed to lend validity to the entirety of the theory several picture experiences with faintness on the character Raskolnikovs behalf, insinuate the veracity of his ideas.After inferring from the rationality of Raskolnikovs hypothesis on illness that the rest of his working theory would too be correct, the reader is led down a path of definite expectations for his/her extraordinary narrator. This path would have been one whereby Raskolnikov was a ble to implement far-flung well being as a result of his murders. Furthermore, he would have been able to avoid submission to the common law of the ordinary people in order to preserve his greatness. This is not, in fact, what happens though. Rather, Raskolnikov is forced to confess by several factors including the very fear of being discovered. This fear is emphasized to illustrate his displacement from the extraordinary man an extraordinary man would not have possessed such fears since he would know that he had a right to execute such actions .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.